Judge Rules Police Did Not Have A Right to Pull Client Over. OVI and Marked Lanes Charges Dismissed

Our client was pulled over for an alleged marked lanes violation, arrested for an OVI offense, and subsequently tested a .129 BAC.  Columbus OVI lawyers with LHA filed a motion to suppress the evidence associated with the case, arguing that the officer violated the Fourth Amendment in seizing our client without just cause.  The case proceeded to a hearing, where the presiding Judge agreed with our argument, and suppressed all of the evidence associated with the case.  Our client agreed to complete a driver intervention program to avoid an appeal, and all charges were dismissed.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. Individual results may vary based on the facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and other factors. The results and client testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of the results obtained by all clients or their satisfaction with the firm’s services.