Case Result Categories

Fairfield County OVI Charges Dismissed

Recently, an individual in Fairfield County found themselves in trouble when they were charged with a second offense for operating a vehicle under the influence (OVI) after submitting to a police officer’s breath test – on which they were charged with a prohibited BAC (blood alcohol content) level. If found guilty of this offense, they could face the following statutory and collateral consequences:

• Up to six months in jail
• A mandatory minimum fine of $525
• Up to a four-year driver’s license suspension
• Installation of an ignition interlock device
• The possibility of restricted license plates
• Challenges related to schooling, employment, child custody, and more

Wanting to avoid these penalties, the individual reached out to the Columbus criminal defense lawyers at Luftman, Heck & Associates for help.

We immediately got to work on the case. After an aggressive defense, he won the motion hearing, and both of the client’s OVI charges were dismissed.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. Individual results may vary based on the facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and other factors. The results and client testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of the results obtained by all clients or their satisfaction with the firm’s services.

Drug Charge Dismissed in Logan County Case

Recently, an individual in Bellefontaine, Logan County found themselves in trouble when they were arrested and charged with OVI (operating a vehicle under the influence). In addition to the drunk driving offense, they were charged with a drug offense. Wanting to avoid the possible penalties of a conviction – which include incarceration, fines, and far-reaching collateral consequences – they reached out to the Columbus criminal defense lawyers at Luftman, Heck & Associates for help.

We immediately got to work on the client’s case. Due to his quick action and involvement in the case, he was able to get the client’s drug charge dismissed. In addition to this dismissal, the client pled to a minor misdemeanor traffic violation as opposed to an OVI.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. Individual results may vary based on the facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and other factors. The results and client testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of the results obtained by all clients or their satisfaction with the firm’s services.

Felony Firearm Case Pled to a Misdemeanor in Franklin County

An individual in Franklin County found themselves in need of a skilled Columbus weapons lawyer after they were charged with improper handling of a firearm. A fourth-degree felony, a conviction for this offense is punishable by up to 18 months in prison, hefty fines, and more. As such, the individual retained the help of Luftman, Heck & Associates.

Due to his quick negotiation and defense skills, Luftman, Heck & Associates was able to get the client’s charge pled down to a misdemeanor for time served (which was two days in jail following the client’s arrest).

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. Individual results may vary based on the facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and other factors. The results and client testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of the results obtained by all clients or their satisfaction with the firm’s services.

Felony Theft Charge Pled Down to a Misdemeanor

Recently, a Central Ohio woman was charged with fifth-degree felony theft. A conviction for this offense could bring with it between six and 12 months in prison, fines, and collateral consequences, so she knew she needed the help of an aggressive, experienced Columbus criminal defense lawyer.

After reaching out to Luftman, Heck & Associates, Luftman, Heck & Associates began working on the client’s case. After negotiations, he was able to plead the felony down to a misdemeanor for time served (which was one day of incarceration following her arrest). In addition, the client was ordered to pay restitution.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. Individual results may vary based on the facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and other factors. The results and client testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of the results obtained by all clients or their satisfaction with the firm’s services.

OVI Charge Resolved in Guernsey County

Recently, and individual in Guernsey County was arrested and charged with operating a vehicle under the influence (OVI) that yielded a high test. In addition to the OVI, a weapon was found during the arrest. Wanting to avoid a felony conviction, they reached out to Luftman, Heck & Associates for help.

Due to our quick action and involvement in the case, LHA resolved the case to an impaired OVI – which is not a felony offense.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. Individual results may vary based on the facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and other factors. The results and client testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of the results obtained by all clients or their satisfaction with the firm’s services.

Felony Public Benefits Fraud Reduced to a Misdemeanor

Recently, an induvial was charged with a fourth-degree felony for public benefits fraud. If convicted, they’d face up to 18 months in prison and five years of probation, so they reached out to a Columbus criminal defense lawyer from Luftman, Heck & Associates for help.

Wanting to help the client avoid these penalties, Luftman, Heck & Associates immediately got to work on the case. After making restitution, the felony was reduced to a first-degree misdemeanor for time served. No additional consequences were imposed.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome in your case. Individual results may vary based on the facts, injuries, jurisdiction, venue, witnesses, parties, and other factors. The results and client testimonials provided are not necessarily representative of the results obtained by all clients or their satisfaction with the firm’s services.